Invalid or Broken rss link.

TMTunisia has seen several firsts in recent years.  First in the wave of Arab Uprisings, first to overthrow the leader, first democratic elections. And now another – first major Arab Islamist party to formally announce the separation of religion and politics, and declare itself part of ‘Democratic Islam’.

The Ennahda party, despite being rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood, says it will separate its religious activity from its political, and that its mosques will be politically neutral. The annual party congress has overwhelmingly approved the move, and party leader, Rached Ghannouchi, (exiled under the Ben Ali dictatorship) went so far as to tell Le Monde “We are leaving political Islam and entering democratic Islam.’

For an Islamist this is a quite an intellectual, political, and theological journey to have made.  All their teaching insists that Islam is a complete, 360-degree, system in which the political and religious worlds are one. There are no entities to separate, and nothing in their scripture approaching the Christian tenet ‘Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.’

If Ghannouchi is sincere, and enough Tunisians believe him, Ennahda has a chance of regaining power in the 2019 elections. In 2014 it lost the election and co-operated in a peaceful transfer of power to a caretaker government of technocrats.

Rached Ghannouchi

Rached Ghannouchi

The leader has had two examples to inform his decision. In Egypt, after the Muslim Brotherhood won the 2012 parliamentary and then presidential elections it went too far, too fast, in implementing religious authority in various walks of life. They alienated the population to the extent that it allowed the military to retake power in a second military coup in 2013. (The first being the overthrow of Mubarak in 2011). By contrast, in Turkey, President Erdogan’s AKP party has been on a decades long march through the institutions and now is strong enough to reveal again what it was at the beginning – a Muslim Brotherhood influenced movement.

As Mr Erdogan has rolled back freedoms, and weakened the secular foundations of the modern Turkish state, Western democracies have fallen out of love with what they called the ‘Turkish Model’.

If Ennahda returns to power, and it is the largest bloc in Parliament, there may be a ‘Tunisian Model’.

If so, is it to be trusted? That is for the Tunisian people to judge. They know that Islamist theologians are quite clear that it is permitted to dissemble, indeed to fool the ‘enemies of true Islam’ by being temporarily pragmatic. They also know that Mr Ghannouchi has always been among the deeper, relatively liberal, and yes, pragmatic, of the Islamist thinkers of the last few decades.

And finally they know that Tunisia has proportionality sent more fighters to join ISIS than most Arab countries. The storms blowing through the region are far from finished. Even if Mr Ghannouchi is dissembling, and he may well not be, better a long peaceful march through the institutions than the violent Islamist nihilism of the jihadists. Better still, the beginnings of the long march to genuine ‘Democratic Islam’.

Adapted from an article first published in the Jewish Chronicle


4 Comments on "Democratic Islam. The Tunisian Model?"

  1. mahatmacoatmabag | 10th June 2016 at 12:51 pm | Reply

    “The Ennahda party, despite being rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood, says it will separate its religious activity from its political, and that its mosques will be politically neutral” What a classic example of Kitman & Taqiyya in action. In Islamic jurisprudence Kitmān (كتمان “secrecy, concealment”) is a subfield of Ḥiyal (the practice of deception or trickery), consisting of the art of making ambiguous statements, paying lip-service to authority while reserving personal opposition, in a kind of political camouflage or reservatio mentalis. As for Taqiyya , well according to Jewish & Christian ethics lying is a sin; In Islamic jurisprudence and theology, the use of Taqiyya against the unbelievers is regarded as a virtue and a religious duty. To sum up the Islamist politicians of Tunisia are pulling a fast one, believe them if you wish Tim but Democracy & Islam are incompatible, in fact mentioning Islam & Peace in the same sentence is an Oxymoron, you can give them the benefit of the doubt if you wish but I will not.

    • Your comment suggests you believe there is only one version of Islam, that there are not different wings, beliefs, ways of thinking, that it never changes – all of which is demonstrably false. The article clearly makes the point about Taqiyya, it also does not state if I believe them or not. Sincere or not – the decision is a better bet for compromise and working with people than the nihilism of the fanatics, or the total rejection and hostility you show.

      • mahatmacoatmabag | 10th June 2016 at 3:00 pm | Reply

        Tim naïve western liberalism is every bit as dangerous as Marxism, Fascism & Islamic extremism. The last 3 set out to kill, subject & rule, the first allows the other 3 to kill, subject & rule. We ordinary proles who do not have the benefit of armed security guards, armoured limos & private jets have to mingle with those that will do us harm, those practitioners of Kitman & Taqiyya that generations of naïve western liberal politicians have let into the West in order to culturally diversify us in line with their naïvely dangerous liberal beliefs. I make no apologies for believing sincerely that Islam is the leopard that can not change its spots irrespective of the size, shape or colour of its different spots.

  2. Peter Kennedy | 12th June 2016 at 3:16 pm | Reply

    I wish the Tunisians luck in their bold experiment and I hope that a) it works out and b) that this form of Islamic politics spreads. The separation of religion and politics is a fabulous idea and although some states already claim to do this they don’t (in reality) practice what they preach.

    You can’t get a better example of this than the USA. Every US President as far back as I can remember has claimed to be a Christian and for a US presidential candidate to admit to anything else would be political suicide. As for Turkey, they claimed to be a secular state for a number of years but now, sadly, this has begun to change.

    Question: What would the difference be between a secular state (like Turkey used to be) and the new Tunisian model?

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please consider if you're contributing to the discussion before you post. Abuse and general negativity will not be allowed to appear on the site. This might be the Internet but let's try to keep things civil.

Your email address will not be published.



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.