GUESTSM2

aaazazGuest writer Simon Moores on the Why drones are a terrorist threat.

As a part-time commercial pilot I’m one of a few who have encountered a drone while making an approach to land; forcing a go-around and reporting my close encounter to air traffic control.

From a technology perspective, drone development has only just passed its Wright Brothers moment and the world, as reflected
in this month’s Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas (CES) is scrambling to discover new opportunities and markets in much the same manner as the early days of aviation. At the same time, western governments worry that criminals and terrorists may also find new ways of cleverly exploiting the new technology.

We’ve heard this month, that the Oxford Research Group, in a report, titled ‘The hostile use of drones by non-state actors against British targets’, wants the UK government to both fund the development of military-style lasers to shoot drones down and the creation of jamming and early-warning systems to be used by police. After reviewing over 200 commercial drones, it concluded the technology only poses a threat if a terrorist group builds a completely new drone from scratch. This is I believe, a dangerously naive and complacent view of a new danger and I’ll explain why.

A flurry of new models and giant strides in lithium battery technology, has taken the equivalent of a first Wright Brothers of 1903 moment for the drone industry and fast-forwarded the technology to the equivalent of 1914 and the outbreak of WW1. For the Wright Brothers, building a light-enough engine to allow their aircraft to achieve powered flight was their greatest challenge. The commercial drone industry has solved this problem in months rather than years and an average flight time of 20 minutes in 2015 will likely stretch to 40 minutes with smaller and more powerful batteries by the end of this year.

From a security perspective, what does this acceleration in the technology mean and what are the risk implications if any?

We can of course expect, larger, faster and more powerful commercial drones with much longer battery lives, greater intelligence and greater range. Already, on my own DJI Phantom 3 Professional, the intelligent software that controls it, is being updated every six weeks or so; adding more powerful and automated control and navigation features that can be easily controlled from my Apple iPad or iPhone.

While top-of-the range drones, could in principle, be used to carry small improvised and precisely GPS targeted explosive devices (IED) very easily indeed, it’s more likely that terrorists and criminals might use them for other purposes and the security services are having to use lateral thinking to keep up with the ideas some of the terrorists might arrive at.

For example, putting a major airport out of action might be achieved easily. I won’t go into detail but all that’s required is one large drone ($2,000) and some easily bought mail order related equipment. All traffic could be halted without even causing an explosion.

To prevent this type of scenario drone manufactures have started building ‘GPS fencing’ into their aircraft software to prevent a drone taking-off anywhere near an airport. But this kind of measure can be ‘spoofed’ by GPS jammers.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

These jammers are becoming more powerful and are widely available online. The cybercrime book, ‘Future Crimes’, refers to an example in mid-2013 when an $80 million yacht was hijacked by spoofing GPS signals. In another example, here in the UK., an organized crime group successfully used GPS jammers to steal more than forty large tractor trailers containing cargo worth in excess of $10 million.

A large commercial drone could easily carry a GPS jammer and land on a vessel entering a port. The equipment could then be used to possibly interfere with a ship’s navigation computer.

Modern passenger aircraft, also rely on GPS as well as their own inertial navigation systems for pin-point accuracy in landing huge aircraft like the A380. The Guardian’s Charles Arthur, reported that Russian-built GPS jammers deployed by North Korea, are reportedly able to affect systems as far as 100km and in 2012, they were used to scramble GPS signals near two of South Korea’s major airports. The United States FAA advised U.S. airlines to exercise caution when near Seoul, ‘due to possible interference with or disruption of GPS navigation systems.’

But a large impact doesn’t always require a large payload or a powerful explosive. As a young man, at the height of the Cold War I researched the deadly chemical agents, Tabun, Sarin and Soman. It’s these G-Series nerve agents which offered Tony Blair a pretext for the invasion of Iraq and which our security services fear may now be under the control of the Daesh, Islamic State.

Any number of existing drones could carry enough nerve agent to cause mass casualties. It doesn’t take much. In the 1995 Tokyo subway sarin attack; 1.3 liters of Sarin was used. It killed 12 people, severely injuring 50 and causing temporary vision problems for nearly 1,000 others. Although this was originally planned as an aerosol attack, it wasn’t possible with the tools available to the terrorists at the time. As a consequence, countless lives were saved.

Finally, drones can be used by both terrorists and criminals for situational awareness. Coming soon are drones carrying infra-red cameras to help law-enforcement, rescue services and others who might wish to see in the dark. The Mumbai attacks of 2008, which lasted over four days, demonstrated how terrorists could use mobile and social media technologies to coordinate their attacks. A drone hovering high above an incident could offer valuable situational awareness during a siege or hostage situation.

With such examples in mind, dismissing drones as a ‘menace that doesn’t exist’ may be premature.

Science fiction writers such as William Gibson, the novelist who gave us the expression, ‘Cyberspace.’ have already anticipated the direction drones are likely to take. The Los Zetas drug cartel in Mexico is reportedly becoming more imaginative with each incremental improvement in the technology. Drones are going to change the commercial landscape as dramatically as aircraft once did in the 1930s but in an increasingly dangerous and uncertain world, governments have no clear answers to the very real risks they will bring with them too.

Simon Moores is a Security Futurist and risk consultant rated in the ‘Top Ten’ of UK ‘Tech Thought Leaders in 2014. An international keynote conference speaker he is the Chair of the annual international eCrime Congress.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

9 Comments on "Drones: A Terrorist Threat"

  1. Really good read, Simon. I’ve been following drones for a while and it’s really one of the most rapidly growing area of innovation and the risks are clearly not being properly noted by governments. I’d be surprised if there wasn’t at least one major incident involving a drone in the next five years.

    In fact, I’m not even sure that GPS spoofing is really applicable. When DJI announced they’d stop drones flying around the White House, they did it through a firmware which sounds a fairly weak solution and one that could easily be be disabled with custom code. Not that it’s probably even necessary. It’s relatively trivial to actually build a drone from scratch. I’ve been watching some of the work around the area of FPV drone racing and it’s evident that some of the devices that are being built might soon be almost impossible to counter. They move fast and accurately. As far as I can see, they wouldn’t even need to carry a huge payload. One of those whizzing through the air could easily be used to target individuals. If I was the American Secret Service I’d really be investing a lot of money into American universities trying to come up with countermeasures such as this (LINK) which I saw yesterday though even this seems so very slow compared to the speeds of some of the drones used in racing.

  2. A very interesting article Simon, on the point of disrupting air traffic it has always surprised me that given the success of the IRA’s economic bombing campaign of the 90’s, which in part targeted transport infrastructure to cause maximum disruption, that no subsequent terror groups have followed this approach.

  3. Space, time…. all relative.

  4. Well argued piece Simon. We are all victims of Tim’s space limit

  5. Re: Marshall’s Law

    If Marshall’s Law applies then so does Walter’s Law.

    Walter’s Law: “Readers have an insatiable appetite for words that support their own beliefs but then only if they don’t have to pay to read them.

Leave a comment

favorites.png
Comments are moderated before they are published. Please consider if you're contributing to the discussion before you post. Abuse and general negativity will not be allowed to appear on the site. This might be the Internet but let's try to keep things civil.
 

Your email address will not be published.


*


*