The Palestinian leadership has been unable to establish direct channels of communication with US President Donald Trump – enter King Abdullah of Jordan.

According to the New York Times “President Trump and his advisers, venturing for the first time into the fraught world of Middle East peace-making, are developing a strategy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that would enlist Arab nations like Saudi Arabia and Egypt to break years of deadlock”.

This argument is based on the assumption that a new alignment is emerging where Israel and Sunni Arab Countries develop a joint strategy to counter Iran. If so, a parallel path towards peace with the Palestinians can be pursued.

King Abdullah visited Washington in early February and had a short unofficial meeting with President Trump, the first such visit from a Middle Eastern leader. The White House then issued a statement cautioning Israel against expanding settlements in the West Bank.

It appears that the King also managed to caution Mr. Trump against a hasty move of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, explaining to him the turmoil that might follow. The reaction to this is less clear than on settlements but a White House statement reiterated America’s commitment to Jordan’s stability and security and thanked King Abdullah for his leadership in promoting peace and stability in the region.

Apart from the ever-present threat from Al-Qaeda and ISIS, Jordan remains a target for Syrian plots to destabilize Jordan.

According to documents seen by Al-Arabiya in 2012 President Bashar al-Assad and his allies sought to destabilize Jordan by manipulating peaceful demonstrations there and turning them into deadly confrontations. The King was first Arab leader to openly (2011) that the President al-Assad should stand down.

The news that the King had met President Trump made headlines news across the Middle East. A typical comment was “The King’s meeting with Trump was very significant and must be built upon for further dialogue on key issues in the region”.

The Palestinian issue is important to Jordan. Over half of Jordan’s population are Palestinians, while many of the Palestinians who live on the West Bank hold Jordanian citizenship. Jordan has historically played an important role in the Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem, which have been a flashpoint of Israeli-Palestinian violence in the past. The King told the President that lack of progress on the peace front affect Jordan’s stability and security and the two leaders agreed that the King would make an official visit ‘to the US soon’.

Their brief conversation gave the King an early opportunity to convey Arab concerns about regional issues. Jordan is hosting the annual Arab summit on March 29 and this early meeting with Trump gives Jordan increased leverage in the region especially as it has good relations with most of the players in the Middle East.

It is interesting that US Republican Senator Bob Corker chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was quoted by US media describing King Abdullah as ‘sort of the Henry Kissinger of that part of the world,’ a reference to Jordan’s pivotal role in bringing Israel and Palestinians to the negotiation table. If Trump’s listening, and if the King has his ear, then Abdullah can be the bridge the Palestinians seem unable to build by themselves.

Nehad Ismail

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

5 Comments on "King Abdullah: The Palestinian Bridge to President Trump?"

  1. By far the most enlightened and pragmatic leader in the middle east. Despite the many problems that have come Jordan’s way he has performed admirably in maintaining stability in the kingdom and in the process maintaining the high level of respect he is held in.

  2. Thanks Rob and I agree 100% with your remarks. What I like about the King is his pragmatism and moderation, so he is much admired by moderate secular people and loathed by extremists.

  3. Fadi A. Haddadin | 21st February 2017 at 5:01 pm | Reply

    Great article by Mr. Nehad Ismail. Jordan has been also providing vital support to the Christian holy sites in Jerusalem along with the Muslim ones, as mentioned by Mr. Ismail.

  4. Like a lot of Middle East politics the Jerusalem / Tel Aviv thing is a mess but I didn’t realise how much of a mess until I bought a new world map for my study. It shows Jerusalem as the Israeli capital rather than Tel Aviv so I contacted the publishers. The issue was obviously known to them and they mailed back a prepared statement describing the history of it all.

    I don’t have access to that document now but Wikipedia gives a reasonable summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positions_on_Jerusalem

  5. Thanks you Peter for the wikipedia link.. Yes it is messy. We either hope the parties to the dispute agree a formula acceptable to both sides. It might not meet their full exact requirements but meeting most of their demands may work. Alternatively the relevant UN Resolutions can be used as a basis for a solution.

Leave a comment

favorites.png
Comments are moderated before they are published. Please consider if you're contributing to the discussion before you post. Abuse and general negativity will not be allowed to appear on the site. This might be the Internet but let's try to keep things civil.
 

Your email address will not be published.


*


*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.