Invalid or Broken rss link.

Prisoners of Geography 2

This is the full version of yesterday’s article.

By Tim Marshall

Making sense of the world’s myriad conflicts is difficult. Without a map, and an explanation of geography, it is almost impossible. Words can tell you what is happening, the map helps you to understand why.

My new book, ‘Prisoners of Geography’, argues that topography imprisons leaders. As the introduction says book“This was true of the Greek Empire, the Persians, the Babylonians, and before them, it was true for every leader seeking the high ground on which to build on to protect the tribe. Rivers, mountains, lakes, deserts, islands, and the seas, are determining factors in history.”

This is not a new theory but one rarely explained.

What is sometimes described as ”meaningless violence” can actually be brutally logical, based on creating a geographical reality such as pushing one set of people from an area and thus linking a motorway to a piece of land their enemy controls.

I first encountered this in the early 1990s during the Bosnia war when field commanders would sit down around a table covered in maps and explain why they were moving along a certain valley. This was a pattern repeated in Kosovo, Macedonia, and on to Afghanistan, Iraq, and then almost back full circle to Syria where the complex cultural and geographic divisions mirrored those of the Balkans.

Read history and you learn how President Assad’s minority Alawite tribe came from the hilly region above the Syrian coast. However, look at a map of the country’s roads, hills, and valleys, and the pattern of some of the fighting becomes clear, especially how Assad’s side are desperate to keep the route from Damascus to the coast open in case they have to make a run for it back to their historical roots.

Russia has been invaded many times from that direction. Enemies have poured across the flat land in front of the Russian border. It is extremely difficult to defend along that long territory running north to south. In front of it is the North European Plain, stretching all the way to France. At its narrowest, between the Baltic Sea and the Carpathian Mountains, the plain is only 300 miles wide. That region is called Poland – which explains why Poland has changed shape so often, sometimes disappearing from the map.

Russia gives us another stark example. Most of its ports freeze in the winter. Its only warm water port is Sebastopol. Even though it does not have access to oceans, it is of vital importance. So when last year Ukraine ”flipped” into the Western (NATO) sphere of influence, Putin felt he had to invade Crimea and annex it. Leaving morality to one side – easy to do in geopolitics – geography had given him no choice.

Some countries were not even on maps until the 20th century, including many in the Middle East. Until recently, most within that region did not think of nation states and legally fixed borders. As the chapter says: “The notion that a man could not travel across a region to see a relative from the same tribe unless he had a document, granted to him by a third man he didn’t know in a faraway town, made little sense. That the document was issued because a foreigner had said the area was now two regions and had made up names for them was contrary to the way in which life had been lived for centuries.”

Those documents were partially due to the Sykes Picot agreement of 1916, when the British and French drew a crude line across a map of the Middle East dividing it into spheres of influence into which, later, nation states were inserted. We are watching, seemingly helplessly, as Sykes Picot is redrawn in blood and the fault lines emerge from the artificial lines drawn by European colonialists.

The Ottoman Empire divided what is now Iraq into three administrative areas, Mosul, Baghdad, and Basra. The British looked at the same area and divided three into one, a logical impossibility Christians can resolve through the Holy Trinity but which in Iraq has resulted in an unholy mess as the Kurds, and Sunni and Shia Muslims fight for control of the regions.

The chapter includes a section on Israel/Palestine, focusing on the fact that much of the West Bank consists of a mountain ridge running from north to south. Israel will not allow a potential enemy force on these heights as heavy weapons could be fired onto the coastal plain. 

Seventy per cent of Israel’s population is on the plain, along with much of the country’s road systems and heavy industry, and its international airport. The distance from the West Bank border to Tel Aviv is about 10 miles and any half decent military could cut Israel in two. As the chapter notes, this is one reason for Israel’s insistence that “even if there is an independent Palestinian state, that state cannot have an army with heavy weapons on the ridge, and that Israel must also maintain control of the border with Jordan.”

Again, the rights and wrongs of this can be argued elsewhere; indeed they have been at this site and no doubt will be again.

Technology is increasingly pushing at geography’s prison bars. American bombers can now fly from the US toiSRAELI PLANE Mosul without refuelling, thus partially freeing them from the absolute necessity of requiring landing rights in another country’s territories.

The Iranian/USA-Israeli tension, though, shows us that geography still has a say.

The Israelis cannot reach Iran in a straight line without flying through other countries’ sovereign airspace, which is, at best, ”problematic” and at worst, very dangerous. Its refueling capabilities are not as advanced as the Americans’ and the long way round would give Iran’s air defences more warning of an approaching attack.

But there is another geographic factor – the Straits of Hormuz. At the widest point, it is only 21 miles across. The Iranians have the ability to close the Straits to the massive energy shipments heading out to fuel the world.

That ability, which is due to geography, concentrates the minds of many countries, and acts as another potential restraining influence on Israel’s decision-making. And to understand that, takes a reading of the politics, a glance at the oil and gas statistics, and a look at the map.

 A longer version of this article first appeared in the UK’s Jewish Chronicle newspaper.


16 Comments on "Prisoners of Geography 2"

  1. Mahatmacoatmabag | 10th July 2015 at 12:16 pm | Reply

    West Bank Tim? I have checked with the examiner of Banks at the Bank of Israel in Jerusalem and he has confirmed to me that no such Bank called the West Bank is licensed for Banking business in Israel. Surely you mean Judea & Samaria, if you recall Jesus was born in the Judean town of Bethlehem near Jerusalem & was familiar with Samaria and Samaritans too . It irks me that the insult ” West Bank ” is still being used to delegitimize Israels sovereign territory, nobody ever calls the illegally created state of Jordan the ” East Bank “

  2. I do indeed mean the West Bank. Until Palestine is a state, we need a name for a place where not everyone agrees with your version of the place name. Things change. I don’t call Texas part of Mexico anymore. Following your logic, given the full extent of Israel at some points in antiquity, parts of Jordan are Israel. They aren’t.

  3. It only there was a book which explained such problems of geography and borders…

  4. Mahatmacoatmabag | 10th July 2015 at 2:49 pm | Reply

    Tim neither Texas or Mexico are mentioned in the Bible , the worlds oldest law book, found in every court in the civilized world both for the swearing of oaths to tell the truth & because it contains the basic laws accepted by all civilized nations. As for your assertion that parts of Jordan are Israel that is true since all of Jordan was Israel as was Lebanon, Syria & much of Iraq, once again the Bible, that Law book gives us the first example of the Law of Contract when it states in Genesis 15:18
    On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, “To your descendants I have given this land, From the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates” That’s why when dealing with contracts you must always read the small print & the Sykes-Picot agreement in no way invalidated Genesis 15:18 since the real owners of the land, the Jews, were not a party to it

  5. Mahatmacoatmabag. Zionism reintroduced secularism to Hebrew culture. That means that, out of a historiographic claim to a homeland, which comes from the Tanakh, it recognizes that “Things change”. שבת שלום

    • Mahatmacoatmabag | 11th July 2015 at 11:08 am | Reply

      Shabbat Shallom Shira, I am a secular Zionist but recognize our right to the Land of Israel is rooted both in the Bible and the archaeological evidence of our centuries of residence in our own land. What I do not accept is kowtowing to our enemies & submitting to their desire to exterminate us in piecemeal fashion by giving up our right to our historic homeland. Things do change but not always for the better. BTW if you are interested you will find me posting as Pudding on my Top Hat using the same Mad Hatter avatar on the Jerusalem Post & the Daily Telegraph

  6. Isn’t it a shame that extremists can’t see beyond the end of their nose. I am half way tbrough this excellent, if not a little scary book. It is compelling and extremely informative reading and I was wondering if it is available in “Italian” – I was recently recommending it to an Italian friend who had asked me for my opinion about events in Libya.

    best wishes

  7. Many thanks David and Tim, I’ve passed the link on.

  8. I just finished reading the book, and I’m interested to hear what you think has changed in terms of America’s influence in the world now that Trump has entered the fray.

    • Hello Ell. USA still has enourmous influence. Obama didn’t use it much, Trump is using it in different ways. Where he doesn’t act – risks a vacuum. Where he does act can go either way – eg N Korea may omly have partially come to the table due to his mad man belligerence act. He has forced NATO states to at least concentrate on budgets. I think the USA’s moral stature has taken a huge blow. But Presidents come and go – this too shall pass.

  9. Dear Tim Marshall.
    Keeping up with the true news(wherever is that obtained?) Have you any observations as to what to read for current geographical political/military/social affairs? (apart from you book- which cleared up lots of misconceptions…For me, subjectively, of course, I ‘know’ this because I compared it with my several years of reading from all sorts of publications and online stuff. Also, maps should never be very far away.
    It is a truism now that there is so much information it is complicated to collate.

    • Hello Ray… I’m a fan of Geoplitical Futures, which allows me to reproduce articles occasionally – they start from geography and move on from there. They are a paid for site – but there’s a lot of free stuff as well. I also subscribe to Foreign Affairs. I try to take a look around elsewhere as well – just to get an idea of other views – eg The Hindu, The Daily Star (Beriut), The National (UAE) with whom I work sometimes, and I also look at news channels with which I may not agree eg RT – to find out what the line is – in that example – the Kremlin.

  10. What do you feel will happen in Africa in terms of Teresa May’s interest and China’s involvement, do you believe there will be a struggle for neo-colonial control of the region or are they still limited so much by their geography?

    • Hi Yasmin, I think Mrs May/UK’s role is limited – albiet worthy of taking notie of. The real player these days is China. There will be competition for access between the great powers – but it will be less ‘colonial’ than last time even though power will count. The Chinese appraoch is huge loans and investment, and then if and when it can’t be repayed – they ask for payment in kind – eg – not recognising Tawian, or perhaps military basing rights.

Leave a Reply to David Waywell Cancel reply

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please consider if you're contributing to the discussion before you post. Abuse and general negativity will not be allowed to appear on the site. This might be the Internet but let's try to keep things civil.

Your email address will not be published.



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.