Invalid or Broken rss link.

HBBritish ‘Boots on the Ground’ to Defeat ISIL?

By Hamish De Bretton Gordon OBE

The Munich talks on Syria suggest that in theory all sides agree that a ceasefire will begin in Syria at the end of this week between all warring factions, less ISIL and the Al-Qaeda affiliates. With these ‘peaceful’ overtones in the air Assad and Putin continue to hammer N Syria, in particular Aleppo and, inexplicably, hospitals. Presumably to gain as much ground as possible before negotiations begin when the guns fall silent? The ceasefire does at least offer a glimmer of hope for the allegedly 15 million displaced people in Syria who at the moment appear to want to extract themselves from the war and into Europe, personified by those desperate souls squeezed up against the Turkish border near Kilis having fled Aleppo.

It is pretty clear that Putin has wrestled the initiative from the West and is calling all the shots.  On the ground he would now appear to be strengthening the Syrian Army with Russian troops and expertise which he should be made to bring to bear now on ISIL and not the moderate opposition.

However, it is equally clear that unless the International Coalition and especially NATO, including the UK also get involved in the heavy lifting against ISIL, the Russian solution will pervade across Syria and Iraq, and Putin’s influence in the Middle East, hitherto the preserve of the US and its Allies, will be dominant.

There is universal agreement that the comprehensive defeat of ISIL is in the world’s best interests and that Coalition air power alone will not bring this about.  ISIL desire for the Caliphate and determination to hold ground is their ‘Achilles Heel’, it sets them apart from terror groups like AQ, and makes them no match for the sophisticated Armies of the West.

The 40,000 ISIL fighters, fanatical, but poorly trained and equipped, currently fighting conventionally, are no match for Western ground forces supported by airpower who should be able to defeat ISIL militarily in weeks rather than daesh 4months.  It is likely that indigenous ground troops, currently opposing ISIL will take months if not years to do this if not directly supported by Western ‘Ground power’.

Though politically challenging it is time to decide whether we [UK] need to commit ground troops to defeat ISIL quickly, in conjunction with the US undoubtedly, or accept that Putin will dictate the pace in the Middle East and allow ISIL to extend its ‘existential’ threat to the UK as previously described by the Prime Minister.  I have just returned from Australia, which has a military commitment to Syria much greater than most European countries, despite being 12000 miles away. The Australians are determined to defeat ISIL in Syria and Iraq because they don’t want to fight them at home. This seems a sound approach to me, but one many don’t seem to understand in the UK.

Having said all this, and as a  veteran of 23 years in the British Army including the Gulf Wars,  I am equally determined, that, if we are to become decisively engaged on the ground now, we don’t repeat the mistakes of those wars.  We must have huge amounts of humanitarian aid ready, just behind the front line to flow directly and immediately into those areas liberated from ISIL for the innocent civilians who have suffered so much….and then British ‘Boots on the Ground’ will be worth it.


3 Comments on "Russia Gains Ground In The Middle East"

  1. 100% agreed! And why stop at Syria? Get whatever military and other assistance that’s required and requested to Afghanistan, Libya, Nigeria, Somalia etc etc to enable those countries to wipe out the scourge of Islamic terrorism themselves while putting some serious international pressure on Pakistan, Iran and the Saudi’s to stop financing,spreading and encouraging such hateful ideology.

  2. mahatmacoatmabag | 19th February 2016 at 12:50 pm | Reply

    Mr. Hamish De Bretton Gordon the man who thinks he is the modern day Lawrence of Arabia, I’ve read your columns in the Telegraph in which you admitted that you have worked in Syria with NGO’s supporting the Sunnis. The West has no business interfering anywhere in the Mid-East and North Africa, not in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, Libya & certainly not in the Palestinian ruled territories. Western mischief making after the defeat of the Ottomans in WW1 created all the problems of the Mid-East & by extension the rest of the planet. I say No Western boots on the ground, no unsupervised aid money, let the Russians help Syria defeat the terrorists on the battlefield & dictate the terms but keep the economic & military sanctions on Iran, put pressure on Sunni states like Turkey, Saudi Arabia & the Gulf States to resettle Syrian Sunni Arabs & return all migrants from Europe by force if need be to their region of origin. You will of course find my views unpalatable, but then again I find pro-Arabists like yours unpalatable too.

  3. The Uk has stripped its military to the bone. Its doubtful if we could defend our own borders let alone those of other countries. Russia has much to loose if ISIS is not routed especially as most of the military talent is Chechen and honing its skills that will one day be used on Russia.
    As for NATO; Turkey is a member and happily bombing the crap out of its Kurds – NATO needs to address that first and then consider its purpose and future – the clue is in the title.

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please consider if you're contributing to the discussion before you post. Abuse and general negativity will not be allowed to appear on the site. This might be the Internet but let's try to keep things civil.

Your email address will not be published.



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.