By Tim Marshall

Today is the 2nd anniversary of South Korea officially extending its air-defence identification zone (ADIZ) to cover a rarely seen underwater rock. Theoretically, any other state which wants to fly over the rock needs to tell Seoul about it in advance. There’s a problem here – China also has an ADIZ in the area and it takes in the rock. So does Japan.

So, China wants the rock, South Korea wants the rock, Japan doesn’t want to rock this particular boat, but does claim nearby islands. Something has to give, the question is Bohaiseamap2how to give it, and how to get it without coming to blows. Happily this month China and South Korea will meet to discuss their maritime borders and this underwater hazard will quickly surface.

The rock is known internationally as the Socotra and is 4.6 metres below the waves in the Yellow Sea, it can only be seen when there are extremely rough seas and a deep enough trough is created to uncover the surface. It is 155 nautical miles from the nearest Chinese island, 80 from the nearest South Korean island. S Korea has extended upwards from the rock and built a heliport and a small research station. It followed this up by demanding that Beijing redraw its own ADIZ so that it didn’t include Socotra. Beijing said no.

South Korea's President Park Geun-hye

South Korea’s President Park Geun-hye

Nevertheless a confident South Korea President, Park Geun Hye  pushed on and created a South Korean ADIZ, declaring Socotra to be inside it. At the time she said  “We reached the decision prudently after consultations with various groups and related ministries so we may guarantee our maximum national interest as a sovereign nation,”

The region is already full of tensions with the Chinese announcing an ADIZ in the East China Sea in 2013 and has been ‘island building’ in the South China Sea which may lead it to declare one there.  South Korea, Japan, and the USA have all flown unannounced military flights through the East China Sea zone to test the Chinese reaction.

Who cares about submerged rocks other than mariners and indeed sub mariners? Answer – everyone – because if you claim the rock, then under the UN’s Law of the Sea, you claim not sovereignty over it, but, instead that your Exclusive Economic Zone extends 200 miles from it in all directions. That’s a lot of fish.

The detail of the law is bound up in distance, continental shelves, and tides and the two sides are due to discuss all this by the end of the year.  However, the South Korean coastguard has clashed with Chinese fishermen near Socotra and the danger of escalation is present.

This dispute is about many things, but the overarching theme in all the maritime disputes now going on in the Yellow, East, and South China Seas is that of China pushing outwards as it expands to become a global power.

Beijing has an interesting tactical decision to make when it comes to Socotra. It knows that if it stands firm in every confrontation in its region it sends out the message that China does not back down. However, that stance could push the other states in the region (bar North Korea) even closer to the Americans. If it compromises, the neighbours may draw the conclusion that they can do business with China and thus hedge their bets on their alliances with the USA.

What lies beneath? A rock and hard diplomatic calculations.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

4 Comments on "Sovereignty – On Stilts"

  1. They still measure these things in miles?

    Sorry this is at a tangent from your interesting post, but how do 200 mile EEZ’s work in the North Sea?

  2. Morning nautical miles yes. For EEZ rules see UNCLOS States have to divide distance if 200 miles is a problem

  3. I can see the sense in a hardline stance by China here, after all the chances of them removing either South Korea or Japan from the US orbit is practically nil, it’s the Spratly’s where I think they could benefit from a softer approach, but then again that area is more valuable.

  4. While it’s easy to think of this as territorial gain, it is also a symptom of dwindling resources; fish, minerals. We’re going to see much more of this as the world population competes more equally for finite resources. The developed world is going to have to share more with those who in the past have not enjoyed a high standard of living.

Leave a Reply to John Page Cancel reply

favorites.png
Comments are moderated before they are published. Please consider if you're contributing to the discussion before you post. Abuse and general negativity will not be allowed to appear on the site. This might be the Internet but let's try to keep things civil.
 

Your email address will not be published.


*


*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.