The What and The Why of the Iran Deal

By Tim Marshall

At time of writing it appears the deal on limiting Iran’s ability to quickly build nuclear weapons may be announced soon. Indications were that it would be Monday – they have clearly got bogged down in some detail.  If there is a deal it will be the culmination of two years of negotiations between Iran and the US led negotiating team of the UK, France, Russia, China, and Germany – known as the P5+1. Few details have emerged, and late last night, Vienna time, there were still some sticking dkERRYpoints.
However, herewith a rundown of what to look for if and when the announcement comes.

ACCESS – The W&Y believes the most difficult point has been over what was originally a demand for unfettered UN inspection of Iran’s nuclear facilities, including military sites. Iran says this is an issue of sovereignty and will not allow the inspections.

President Obama had promised this was an absolute requirement. This has subsequently been watered down to ‘negotiated access’, and last week the term ‘managed access’ emerged from the talks. Without snap, unfettered inspections, there is the possibility of Iran removing evidence in the event that it was breaking the agreement.

SANCTIONS – The timing of when UN sanctions would be lifted is important. We wait to see if they are lifted immediately a deal is signed, which would be a victory for Iran, or a period of time must pass before this happens. Secondly, originally the demand was that sanctions would ‘snap back’ immediately should Iran violate any agreement, it appears the text might now say this would require a vote at the UN Security Council.

BREAKOUT TIME – This is the time required to spin enough weapons-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb. It is currently estimated that Iran could do this in as little as three months. The deal may push this to 12 months. There is disagreement over whether even 12 months would be enough time in which to prevent Iran from ‘breaking out’ if it carried out the work in secret, and given the Nuke symboltime it takes to get the diplomatic approval preceding a use of force.

CENTRIFUGES – The Americans originally insisted that Iran would have to cut its 19,000 centrifuges to 1,500. It then changed this to 4,000, now it’s thought Iran will be allowed to have 6,000. Sceptics argue this is more than required if they are only for civilian use. However many centrifuges which are dismantled will be kept in Iran under UN supervision. The site at Fordow, buried under a mountain, will only be used for storage.

URANIUM ENRICHMENT – This will only take place at the Natanz site and use older centrifuges which struggle to spin uranium at the speeds required to produce weapons grade material.

STOCKPILES – Iran has 8 tons of highly enriched uranium. The text should tell us how much can be used for medical research, how much must be diluted, and if any will be moved abroad.

DURATION – How the long the deal is for is of interest. It’s thought the text will say for between 10 and 15 years.

Congress2

 

If the deal is done the US Congress will want a say on it. Because the parties missed a July 9th deadline, Congress will now have up to 60 days to see if it want to approve the text. During this period President Obama cannot lift American sanctions. Congress is also expected to insist that every 90 days the President must confirm that Iran is fulfilling its side of the bargain.

It’s been a long road. There is still further to go.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

4 Comments on "The What and The Why of the Iran Deal"

  1. nehad ismail - United Kingdom | 13th July 2015 at 8:43 am | Reply

    I agree the deal as and when signed is a victory for Iran. The nuclear deal as it stands and from the information available is good for Iran and bad for everyone else. The negotiations between the US and Iran (and the spectators 5: UK, France, Russia, Germany, and China) have not achieved substantive concessions from Iran.
    Iran failed to provide details about its secret nuclear weapon program (PDM), Iran also refused to allow unfettered intrusive inspection of suspected military sites. However Iran agreed to postpone and scale down its nuclear enrichment activities.

    What is most obvious to most observers is that Obama and Kerry are desperate to appease the Mullahs of Iran and to achieve some sort of foreign policy success.

  2. Mahatmacoatmabag | 13th July 2015 at 11:37 am | Reply

    History will record President Obama as the Father of the Iranian bomb. I was listening to former US ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, talking on Fox today, he said that having Iran, Russia & China sit on the committee to decide on any future violations of the watered down inspection regime is the equivalent of having Al Capone as part of the Jury at his trial. If the agreement is signed today the most likely outcome of the Obama / Kerry surrender to the demands of the mad mullahs of Teheran will be a nuclear arms race by Sunni Arab oil states such as Saudi Arabia, an eventual preemptive strike by Israel either just before Obama leaves office or at the beginning of the new presidents term or in a worse case scenario nuclear war in the mid-east if Iran attempts to annihilate Israel with Iran being completely wiped off the map by an overwhelming nuclear response by Israel

  3. Stacey McGill | 13th July 2015 at 1:29 pm | Reply

    I find myself in rare agreement with Mr Ismail. In my opinion, this agreement is looking more and more like Clinton/North Korea part two – and we all know what weapons North Korea has today. As I alluded to in a comment on a previous post concening Iran’s nuclear ambitions, perhaps a joint desire to keep the Lion of Persia in check will lead to a re-assessment of the Arabs’ irrational preoccupation with the Lion of Judah (albeit a quiet one).

  4. nehad ismail - United Kingdom | 13th July 2015 at 8:37 pm | Reply

    Thanks Stacey. Even husband and wife don’t agree on everything.

1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. The Iran deal | Anne's Opinions

Leave a comment

favorites.png
Comments are moderated before they are published. Please consider if you're contributing to the discussion before you post. Abuse and general negativity will not be allowed to appear on the site. This might be the Internet but let's try to keep things civil.
 

Your email address will not be published.


*


*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.