Invalid or Broken rss link.

US Policy in Syria? – Ask The Russians…

By Tim Marshall.

The U.S. strategy in Syria is staggering around looking for ideas and inspiration. Neither appear to be forthcoming, but the Russians are pretending to offer both while continuing to steal a march in the great game.

RS5As previously reported in the W&Y, while the Americans have been busy failing, the Russians have been fast tracking re-enforcements into Syria. They are positioning themselves as the key power broker as they try to maintain their influence in Syria by propping up President Assad in order to keep their foothold in the Mediterranean.

Now the White House looks ready to accept an offer from Moscow for direct military-to-military talks in the coming days on the build-up of Russian forces. This will allow Sec of State John Kerry to growl gravely into the cameras that ‘The US is concerned about –insert sentence of choice – and advise the Russians to –insert next sentence of choice’. Meanwhile the Russian planes and ships will keep arriving at Latakia and Tartus.

The Russians have now almost completed the runways they are building at the Bassel al Assad air base in Latakia. Some serious hardware has appeared including tanks, rS7armoured personal carriers, and four military helicopters. A state of the art artillery battery is in place to protect these along with, at the least, dozens of ground troops, probably Marines. We now wait to see if fighter jets are flown in.

Bloomberg cites U.S. officials as telling them that Russia plans to deploy MiG-31 interceptors and Su-25 attack aircraft, while Reuters says Moscow is to send SA-22 surface-to-air missile systems.

If this happens, then there is the potential for a scenario in which Russian planes attack anti Assad forces who are partially armed by the USA. If they were to go up against ISIS, then they could find themselves in the same airspace as American war planes doing the same. ‘De-confliction protocol’ is a complicated business. No wonder the Americans feel they may need to talk.

The Russian moves make the possibility of a unilateral No Fly Zone, even over parts of Northern Syria extremely problematic for the Americans. What if the Russians do not recognize this zone and reserve the right to defend their ally, Assad, in all parts of the country?

So at the moment the Americans may be limited in their use of the Incirlik air base in Turkey, nervous about coming into contact with Russian forces, and wary of the Russian missile batteries. At the same time they admit the number of US trained anti Assad opposition forces inside Syria may be as few as….5. This amounts to an abject failure in a policy supposed to deliver more than 5,000 trained troops a year for years. Concurrent to this debacle is their lack of a coherent diplomatic policy.

On the other hand the Russian Foreign Ministry in Moscow is a blur of visitors from Iran, Israel, Syria, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and other countries. Early next week the Iranians are in town again, followed by the Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu.

What do the Russians get out of all this? Firstly, they ensure the survival of the Syrian regime even if it is confined to the Damascus – Homs – Latakia regions. They may be able to deliver some battlefield success for the regime starting in the Sahl al-Ghab regon where the elite 4th Armoured Division is preparing an offensive.

Moscow is also now well positioned to block any American ideas which emerge, although at the moment the Obama administration seems devoid of such things.
Perhaps most importantly for Russia is that it can now use its increasingly strengthened position in Syria to eke out concessions from the USA and others over a matter of even greater importance to them – Ukraine and sanctions.

Next week sees the opening of the annual U.N. General Assembly in New York. This is an ideal venue for meeting ‘in the margins ‘. The Americans can try to find out how much the Russians are committing to Syria, and what they want in return for Moscow to draw in it’s claws.


2 Comments on "US Policy in Syria? – Ask The Russians…"

  1. nehad ismail - United Kingdom | 18th September 2015 at 1:32 pm | Reply

    Right. I agree with the analysis. I would like to say that Putin has been emboldened by the naivety of John Kerry the American Secretary of State and the self-inflicted impotence of President Barack Obama.
    It is clear that Putin’s objective is the survival of Assad at any cost.
    The so-called military talks with the US is another trap set by Moscow for Washington to legitimise Assad and to make him a partner in the fight against ISIS which Assad himself, aided by Iran helped to create in the first place.

  2. Come on Tim, don’t follow the herd. Why should the Americans get more involved in what is ostensibly a sectarian conflict? Obama’s instincts are right. Let the sides fight it out to soften them up for negotiations that will come in the end while in the mean time contain Islamic State and roll it back when opportunities arise. This gloating over Putin is so daft. Of course he is going to protect a cold war ally and one of Russia’s few warm water ports. It’s not the US that is on the back foot, but Putin, as the regime was about to collapse; and that is despite Iranian and Hizballah involvement. Putin may regret his intervention though, and perhaps in the mean time you should suspend judgement! And don’t follow the herd!

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please consider if you're contributing to the discussion before you post. Abuse and general negativity will not be allowed to appear on the site. This might be the Internet but let's try to keep things civil.

Your email address will not be published.



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.