Invalid or Broken rss link.


This summer  the Wall Street Journal broke  news of a secret transfer of $400 million in foreign currency via an unmarked cargo plane to Iran back in January.  Subsequently the White House had been forced to repeatedly deny having paid what was a ransom to Iran for the release of American hostages.

Iran has aired a documentary containing footage of pallets of millions in foreign currency that the video claims was part of the “expensive price” the Obama administration paid to free four U.S. hostages in January.

Obama has broken all the rules to appease the Ayatollahs. His administration has misled the public to spin the apparent $1.7 billion ransom payment to Iran.

Republicans believe that President Obama’s disastrous nuclear deal with Iran was sweetened with an illicit ransom payment and billions of dollars for the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,”. So, why Iran is still unhappy with Obama?

Iran has violated U.N. Security Council resolutions banning Iranian missile launches. It conducted a naval missile test in dangerous proximity to a U.S. fleet aircraft carrier in the Gulf. It hijacked a U.S. military ship and videotaped the humiliation of its crew.

More recently an Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps missile ship and three fast-attack crafts demonstrated aggressive behavior in the vicinity of a US ship.

And yet, despite the partial lifting of sanctions, the release of billions of dollars and the granting of nuclear exemptions, the Ayatollahs of Iran are not happy.

The nuclear deal hasn’t delivered the benefits Iran was hoping to receive. Its ambition to be a global heavy weight and the sole major regional player has not materialised. Others, such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Egypt are still calling the shots.

The leadership thought the signing of the nuclear accord would mark a new phase in its relations.

However, despite all the hard work of the Tehran funded lobbies in Washington, the pro-Tehran advisers in the White House, and the millions of dollars spent on PR and favourable press reporting, Iran is still not enjoying the fruits of the nuclear deal. Most banks remain reluctant to deal with Iran. American banks are not open for business with Iran.

Washington is fully aware that Iran, like its friends in Damascus, are the biggest sponsors of terrorism and abusers of human rights.  It is bogged down in Iraq and Syria. Its military has failed to defeat the anti-Assad opposition despite Russian involvement.

Tehran’s relations with Russia are strained. Russia embarrassed Tehran by telling the world that Iran allowed its air-force to use bases in Iran to attack targets in Syria.

Iran has not moderated its human rights policies. It executed 966 people in 2015, over 100 were juveniles. Amnesty International’s report for 2015/2016 says “They blocked Facebook, Twitter and other social media websites, jammed foreign satellite television stations, arrested and imprisoned journalists and suppressed peaceful protests.”

An important report issued by the Institute for Science and International Security, a Washington, D.C. arms-control think tank, revealed that Iran was secretly granted exemptions to the July 2015 nuclear agreement so it could meet requirements for what the agreement calls “Implementation Day” — when Iran was to receive an estimated $150 billion in sanctions relief.

Not coincidentally, the same day that Implementation Day was announced (January 18), U.S. officials announced a swap of 18 Iranian prisoners held by the United States for five U.S. citizens who had been illegally held by Iran. An additional 14 Iranians were removed from an INTERPOL wanted list. (A London based Iranian opposition figure told me that the 18 Iranian prisoners refused to go back to Iran).

The Institute report cites an unnamed official who said that without these exemptions, some of Iran’s nuclear facilities would not have been in compliance with the JCPOA by Implementation Day.

Some of the exemptions were significant and allowed Iran to not report activities with nuclear weapons-related applications. One of the exemptions allowed Iran to violate a cap of 300 kg for its enriched-uranium stockpile under certain circumstances.

As the West is trying hard to renew business relations with Iran, the regime continues to oppress its citizens and deny their basic human rights. The regime hopes that the promise of business deals will blind the world to Iran’s crimes against its own people.


5 Comments on "Why The Ayatollahs Are Angry With Obama."

  1. Thank you Nehad, an interesting piece. I am of the firm opinion that future generations will be as harsh with Obama as today’s is with Neville Chamberlain – whose premiership is summed up in a single sentence of four words: “peace in our time”. It is obvious that many in the Arab and Islamic world see that the biggest threat in the region is the Sunni-Shia divide – leaving the Israel/Palestine conflict a distant second. Sunni Saudi is being enticed into the Western sphere of influence (Jordan-Egypt-Israel-US) making giant strides in that direction, even Turkey isn’t burning any bridges with the Zioinist State. And most recently, horror-of-horrors, Sunni Pakistan (albeit with a sizable Shia minority) is allowing its pilots to train with Israeli Air Force personnel – using the cover of US Red Flag as a flimsy excuse. I am sure many won’t agree with me, pointing out real or imagined bones of contention: I would just point out that the same was said about Jordan in 1973, and the late King Hussein quite happily stabbed his so-called Arab allies in the back, providing invaluable Intelligence to the IDF, before and during the Yom Kippur War.

  2. Thanks Stacey. I don’t disagree with you.

  3. Way back when I was young and foolish I was in Beirut three weeks after Terry Waite was kidnapped, my job was to service and repair some printing equipment at a newspaper. One of my bodyguards (provided by the paper) was Russian and at one point I asked him if he was worried about being kidnapped. “No”, he replied, “if any Russian was kidnapped like your Terry Waite then Moscow would reduce this city to a smoking glass crater”.

    I think that my Russian friend was completely serious. Now compare and contrast that approach with the current US policy of appeasement in the Middle East mentioned above, a policy which goes back as far as the Saudi nationals spirited out of America on the day of 9/11. Which policy do you think would be the most effective?

    US policy in the Middle East is not working. One of the definitions of insanity is doing the same thing again and again but expecting different results. The USA have left a trail of failed states in the Middle East thanks to their intervention yet they keep on trying ‘just one more time’. Crazy.

  4. Thanks Peter and David for an the interesting contrast between US and USSR approach to kidnapping and to events in the Middle East.

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please consider if you're contributing to the discussion before you post. Abuse and general negativity will not be allowed to appear on the site. This might be the Internet but let's try to keep things civil.

Your email address will not be published.



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.